![how many studies for a comprehensive meta analysis review how many studies for a comprehensive meta analysis review](https://s3.studylib.net/store/data/007726421_2-ddfb167fd5558cf439d5d5089826f448.png)
According to the Global Asthma Report, it is the 16th leading cause of disability adjusted life years lost (DALYs) and 28th leading cause of burden of disease.ĭespite advancement in understanding of the disease and availability of effective treatments, asthma remains one of the most common causes of preventable visits to emergency department (ED) and admissions to hospital in children. ConclusionĬommunity-based asthma care using more comprehensive approaches may improve childhood asthma management and reduce asthma related health care utilization.Īsthma is a significant public health problem affecting 339 million people worldwide. Comprehensive asthma programs with multicomponent interventions were associated with significant reduction in asthma-related Emergency Department (ED) visits (OR = 0.26 95% CI 0.20–0.35), hospitalizations (OR = 0.24 95% CI 0.15–0.38), number of days (mean difference = − 2.58 95% CI − 3.00 to − 2.17) and nights with asthma symptoms (mean difference = − 2.14 95% CI − 2.94 to − 1.34), use of short-acting asthma medications/bronchodilators (BD) (OR = 0.28 95% CI 0.16–0.51), and increase use of asthma action plan (AAP) (OR = 8.87 95% CI 3.85–20.45).
#HOW MANY STUDIES FOR A COMPREHENSIVE META ANALYSIS REVIEW TRIAL#
Of the 2352 studies identified, 21 studies were included in the final analysis: 19 pre-post interventions, one randomised controlled trial (RCT) and one retrospective study. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects model to estimate pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All studies reporting community-based asthma interventions with ≥ 2 components (e.g., asthma self-management education, home environmental assessment or care coordination etc.) for children aged ≤ 18 years were included. MethodsĪ systematic search of Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library and hand search of reference collections were conducted to identify any research articles published in English between 20.
![how many studies for a comprehensive meta analysis review how many studies for a comprehensive meta analysis review](https://www.mdpi.com/ijerph/ijerph-17-07394/article_deploy/html/images/ijerph-17-07394-g001-550.jpg)
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of comprehensive community-based interventions with ≥ 2 components in improving asthma outcomes in children.